Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP Master Data Governance
Viewing all 2047 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Approve button missing for MDG M Workflow

July 16, 2013, 4:02 pm
$
0
0

Hello All,

 

I am trying to set up email notifications for the standard workflow in MDG-M.

I used a standard SAP document attached to work.

Unfortunately, this did not work. So i reverted back all the steps and deleted the BRF+ Z application which calls this step.

 

http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c059adc5-65f7-2e10-36ab-81eb43f531fe?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true&52849572736537

 

And Now my actual standard 86 workflow is also not working. This was working perfectly fine with last status of material as 'Final Check Approved'

 

I am able to create material, but after refresh 'Approve' or 'Reject' buttons are missing which were visible earlier.

The materials are in 'Changes to be executed' status only.

I am not able to proceed further in approving/rejecting

 

 

Please give hints on this.

 

Thank you,

Shaila.

↧
Search

Adaptations in MDGS FPM OVP

September 13, 2012, 3:25 am
$
0
0

Dear All,

 

we are implementing MDGS in EHP6, facing problem with adding adaptation delete and block for supplier in custom WD application configuration. when i'm trying to add in custom application configuration its asking access key.

 

Is it possible to add without access key in custom application configuration?

 

 

Thanks in advance.

↧
↧

Create and change workflow not triggering BRF+ rules in MDM-M

September 11, 2013, 5:26 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts

 

We have created CHECK and DERIVATION rules on FMDM_MODEL_MM. The Log message action that the rules perform are set to ABORT with a message.

 

Our problem is that the Create or Change workflow does not trigger the rule set and hence does not return any error.

 

We have tested this in simulation mode and there it is working correctly.

 

Has anyone encountered this before? Any suggestions on resolving this issue?

 

Regards

 

Danie

↧

SAP MDGF- G/L account not displaying in G/L account master table(SKA1)

September 18, 2013, 11:37 pm
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

I am trying to configure MDG-F and able to create a G/L account through MDG. But after both final approval of the change request and edition release I am not able to see the data in SKA1 table.

 

Data is able to appear in 1/md.... table for G/L accounts.

 

 

I also read that MDGF is using Flex mode that is active data will store in MDG generated tables only.  But, Could anyone please let me know how can I see the same approved data into SKA1 database table for g/l account master?

 

Do I need to do any configuration for this?

 

Thanks!!

 

Regards

Prateek

↧

MDG as HUB on SRM Server - Vendor Data Missing

September 17, 2013, 1:56 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts.

 

We have tried maintaining MDG as HUB on SAP SRM Server. After the migrating the data to MDG it was observed that the Vendor data was missing in the MDG System.

 

This occured due to the Server Component of SRM where the server component switched off the vendor data.

 

I wanted to understand, whether a similar case would occur if MDG is placed as a HUB on SAP CRM Server & after then the Customer data will be deleted due to the server component of CRM.

 

Can anyone throw any light on it.....????

 

 

Thanks in Advance.

 

Shankar

↧
↧

Edition for Finance Master Data in MDG

September 17, 2013, 8:48 am
$
0
0

Hello

 

I have a few questions on Utilization of Edition concept in Master Data Governance production. I know it is used to maintain period specific versions of a master data (Cost Center, Profit Center, GLs etc.).

 

My First Question is on the requirements of having a new Edition. When do you need a new Edition?

 

Why does the current Edition get closed when you create a new Edition? Why is an Edition a Global Entity and why can't I have multiple editions active at the same time on a particular day?

 

Basically we like to maintain multiple Cost Centre versions and do not prefer the Edition controlling their validity. mainly due to the fact that if I create a new edition, it ends the current edition and the validity of other master data of current edition also ends which is not desired.

 

If a business user wants to end the validity of a particular Cost Center, would you expect business user to create an edition and then create a new version of that cost centre under the new Edition?

 

Could you please share your experience on how Editions are being managed?

 

Regards

Pranav

↧

Material description derivation

March 15, 2013, 1:11 am
$
0
0

Hello experts!

 

I need to make a derivation of material description (field MAKTX). But I can't figure out how to make a reference to this field on brfplus.I try to create new data object with type MAKTX like a text element, but it doesn't work.

 

Any ideas?

↧

MDG integration with SAP BODS

September 17, 2013, 1:59 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts.

 

 

I'll have to integrate SAP MDG with SAP BODS. Can anyone help us with the process relating to it .

 

Can you please share some suitable links.

 

Thanks in Advance.

 

 

 

Shankar

↧
Search

MDG-M Create Material Error (role SAP_MDGM_MENU in NWBC)

December 2, 2013, 9:27 pm
$
0
0

Hi, Experts!

 

I have the problem: My CR Creatr (Change) material in NWBC not work after second screen: selected type request=MAT01/MAT02, (see dump the attachment).

I am using EHP6 of MDG6.0 SAP ERP standard definition customazing.

 

the short dump st22:

Category                        ABAP Programming Error

Runtime Errors               OBJECT_NOT_STRUCTURED

ABAP Program              CL_USMD_CONV_SOM_GOV_API=====CP

Application Component   CA-MDG-AF


Can you please help me in resolving this issue?

Thank you

 

Regards,

Alex

↧
↧

READ_MATERIAL Method ends in ASSERT violation error

December 3, 2013, 8:36 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We are interested in implementing BADI USMD_SSW_RULE_CONTEXT_PREPARE as we want to enhance the user agent determination using the Supplier Account Group (LFA1-KTOKK)

 

We have implemented everything according to the how-to document. While testing we keep getting an assert violation in our method READ_SUPPLIER (which is copied from the example implementation method READ_MATERIAL)

 

We tested the READ_MATERIAL method in the example implementation and we are also still getting the same assert violation error. We have implemented the pre-req notes 1700197  and 1837696.


Has anyone else come across this issue and any ideas what we can do to fix this?



Thanks,


Luqman

↧

Replication of Custom MDG entity - Delta only

December 4, 2013, 7:06 am
$
0
0


Dear Experts,

 

I'm trying to find a solution for replicating a Custom MDG entity delta records only.

Using DRFOUT, when I use my filter, I'm able to replicate all active records using my Replication model (type RFC).

 

My question is, can I use the Replication mode: Changes (the one that identifies the changed records based on Change Pointers) and replicate only the newlly activated records?

 

Also any other ideas on how to replicate the delta are welcome.

 

Thanks in advance,

Boris

↧

BRFplus rules will not be executed; inform your administrator

December 2, 2013, 9:33 pm
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

We are facing this issue when trying to perform any change request in MDG material.

The error is BRFplus rules will not be executed; inform your administrator.

ID XXXXXX is initial, unknown, or it does not have the correct object type.


Can anyone give pointers to resolve this?


The display help says to - "To correct the error, activate, change, or delete your BRFplus rules in Customizing activity Define Validation and Derivation Rules".


But we are confused how should be we about deleting the BRFplus rules, as there are four options to delete the object,

Mark for obsolete

Mark for deletion

Delete objects(logical)

Delete objects(physical)


Thank you,

Shaila.

↧

MDGIMG Missing workflow tree

December 2, 2013, 1:23 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Can you kindly help me know what is causing the missing customizing activities related to SAP MDG Workflow under MDGIMG--> General setting ---> Process modeling ---> Workflow ---> Configure workflow tasks?

 

My issue is when I clicked configure workflow tasks, the missing entries under CA-MDG is missing.

 

Appreciate if you can help me know what to check and how to resolve this.

 

Thanks.

Regards,

Riza

↧
↧

Two idocs are generating for same outbound message type DEBMAS

August 12, 2013, 7:06 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We have a scenario like after final approval of Change Request, data will be replicated automatically in to ECC system. For that we are using DRF and ALE configuration. When we are doing manual replication using DRFOUT, it generates 1 idoc.However, when it is calling from workflow it generates 2 idoc and 1 got processed successfully and other gets failed and saying that the account is blocked by user. Those 2 idocs are generates in 1-2 seconds interval. From workflow the function module 'USMD_DISTRIBUTE_CREQUEST' is called only once but still it is generating 2 idocs. When this function module is generated by stand alone, it is creating only 1 idoc.

 

Please suggest how we can avoid this duplicate idoc generation. This is very urgent.

 

Regards,

Subhronath

↧

SAP MDG-S Config from NW MDM?

December 3, 2013, 10:44 am
$
0
0

We currently utilize NW MDM as the repository for SAP Vendor master data. Is anyone aware of any method,
process, or even technology that would allow us to leverage the NW MDM configuration for Vendor master data as we begin our implementation of MDG-S?
Thanks!

 

Matt Dawe

↧
Search

MDG 6.1 BP upload from CSV file

August 12, 2013, 2:47 am
$
0
0

Dear all:

 

We need to upload ~14.000 BP (customer) addresses from a CSV file. Our system is on MDG-C 6.1 SP02. The data in the CSV file is quite simple. We only need to create a few address fields.

According to the research I did the only way to upload this data from a CSV file is to use MDG File Download/Upload. MDG File Download/Upload only allows the data upload by Entity Type. So, my conclusion is that our objective to create only a few address fields can become quite a complex task if we need to create a full BP/customer record by uploading entity by entity (table by table). This requires as well that one knows the right entity/table upload sequence.

 

  1. We managed to upload BP_HEADER und BP_CENTRAL entities (BUT000). Currently we are stuck trying to upload the address data. Relevant entity types for the address data upload seem to be BP_ADDR (BUT020), ADDRNO (BUT020?) and AD_POSTAL/AD_NAME_O (ADRC). BP_ADDR, ADDRNO and AD_POSTAL are all giving the error message "Field Addr. no. of transfer structure is unknown" when we are trying to select and add field "Address Number" to the file download/upload structure. For the initial address creation our plan was to leave field "Address Number" (ADDRNO) blank in the upload file and only have values in field Business Partner Number (BP_HEADER) since Address Number range interval is internal according to our system customizing. However, as I said we are not even able to add field Address number to the download/upload structure because of the above mentioned error message. Did anyone already experience similar problems ? Or how did you manage to initially upload Address Numbers ?

 

2. Can anyone tell if corresponding customer tables are automatically populated by MDG CVI e.g. once we will upload the BP roles (BP_ROLE) or do we need to upload all relevant customer tables as well using corresponding entity types (e.g. BP_CUSGEN) ?

 

Thanks.

 

Regards,

 

Selho

↧

Missing DRF Customizing when trying to Ale Vendor with BD14

December 3, 2013, 10:28 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We have activated and configured MDGS with Vendor like UI by using configuration guide Configure Master Data Governance for Supplier (G43) from RDS. We will be using Co-deployment and thus did not have to configure for HUB. Our configuration were done in our master config client 201 and we had to transport our config to our 251 client were master data would be maintained and tested. MDG is working correctly in the 251 client and we are able to maintain Vendors in the MDGS.

 

Another department involved in the implementation wanted to Ale plant vendors using transaction BD14 to Ale the Plant vendors from client 201 where it was created to client 251. When they tried that, they got a short dump indicating that we have to configure DRF Customizing due to MDG that was activated.

I checked and all the ALE configurations were already setup correctly. We also configured all the DRF customizing, defined the settings for business systems and created the distribution model but still get the dump that DRF configuration is incomplete in our 201 client.

 

Error analysis
    Short text of error message:
    No DRF Customizing determined for client system D20CLNT201

    Long text of error message:
     Diagnosis
         The IDoc processing could not determine DRF Customizing for the
         client system D20CLNT201.

 

I also checked the replication model and the communication channel is setup with Replication with Idoc and Filter after change analysis.

 

We also tried transaction DRFOUT to see if we could determine if the config was incomplete. In simulation mode it picked up some vendors but when we removed the test selection it failed and indicated "Supplier could not be sent via vendor IDOC" with Diagnosis "The replication of the supplier via vendor IDOC is not supported by this implementation"

 

I have some questions:

 

1.Has anyone experienced the same problem and found a solution?

2.In the config step "Define technical settings for Business system" should the business system be the sending system and the logical system and  

   RFC destination be the receiving systems? I noticed that this setting affects the available value in Assign target systems for the Replication model.

3.Do we need to maintain any DRF customizing in our 251 receiving client

 

Your feedback would be highly appreciated.

 

Thanks and best regards

 

Riaan

↧
↧

Financial Objects(Cost center, Cost element, profit center) Not repliacting to their respective Standard Database tables.

December 2, 2013, 9:17 pm
$
0
0


Hello Experts,

 

I am working on MDG-F and trying to maintain the master data in the standard tables of respective  financial objects like Cost center,profit center and cost element etc.

 

I already created their respective editions with Immediate change request check box as tick and perform all the necessary configuration steps related to ALE and Data replication model and activate it.

 

 

After, final approval data is gettig saved in generated tables but not replicating to the standard tables. But for G/L account it is getting reflected in SKA1 table. Please let me know why for other objects this functionality is not working. Did I missed something?

 

 

Regards

Prateek

↧

Embedded Search for SAP MDG

December 5, 2013, 7:02 am
$
0
0

Hello all - I am working my way through the configuration guides for the Material data model.  One of the first steps is to "Set Up Search", according to this guideline: http://help.sap.com/erp_mdg_addon61/helpdata/en/5b/362c74ba324597ace35c6422370afe/content.htm?frameset=/en/77/29AD50E6542F3CE10000000A44538D/frameset.htm

 

I activated the Embedded Search service in SICF and I can access the administration cockpit.  However, I am wondering if there are any specific configurations that need to occur in order for SAP MDG to work?  The SAP Help document just mentions that Embedded Search needs to be functional, but it doesn't specifically call out any particular configuration items. 

↧

Custom UIBB data - save into database tables

December 5, 2013, 10:46 pm
$
0
0

Hello experts ,

 

Could you please let me know what method I need to follow to save my custom UIBB staging data to active area (database table)

I have created two custom list UIBB, I am able to  save the date into staging tables when ever CR gets saved . But I want push the same data to database tables ( ex : data has to store into table KNVD  )once the change request gets approved .

I am trying to with the below options not sure if I am doing correct approach or not

Really appreciate your guidance

 

  1. 1) Created the custom class with the interface as IF_USMD_PP_ACCESS , and maintained this class into data model  for a custom active area .  Maintain the active area name to entity ( I have entity type 4 ) – planning to redefine the method SAVE (IF_USMD_PP_ACCESS ) , --is this right approach ?
  2. 2) I am following the how to document  --(  Extend the MDG Business Partner – Node Extension (Reuse Option) where they explained to create custom handler class  - Is this right approach ?


Thank you

↧
Viewing all 2047 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>