Dear all,
we are working in configuring MDG-F for Gl accounts, we are using the standard forms and workflows but apparently something is not working fine with our workflows as in the second step of WS7570040 the CR get stuck there , and we can´t process it . We have followed the standard configuration but it is still there with no progress.
Thanks
Hi Experts,
On Search ERP Customer or Search ERP vendor while initial loading the screen I want to default the value with BP ROLE instead of ADDRESS DATA without removing other functionality.
I am able to set the BP ROLE while initial load by hard coding the search control value in FILL_METHOD_DROPDOWN of CL_MDG_BS_SEARCH_SWITCH_FEEDER class but the functionality missing
How to achieve this please suggest.
Thanks ,
Rajkumar
Hi all,
Good Day!!
This is the error I am getting. I understand no agent is found in my workflow, so the error pops up.
But I have configured all the possible steps to make it work...
Let me list down
Below is the issue:
Even though I have assigned the processor, it says, I am not the one…
Let me list down the steps I have done to make it work,,,
After all the above configuration has been done, I still get Processor error.. Am I missing out something
Please let me know.. Thanks 
Hello!!
I'm working with MDG-S for supplier creation, i'm using the relationships in order to create the contact person of vendor.
The contact Person is sucessfully asigned to the Supplier in MDG, but when i replicate the vendor (Using ADDRMAS & CREMAS) the contact person is not replicated.
Is there any adicional configuration in the distribution model to replicate this information?
Best Regards!
Fernando!
Hi Experts,
Can you please guide if we can change the status from 01 (to be considered and approved) to custom status in parallel step of the parallel BRF+ workflow?
Thanks
Regards
Nitish Sharma
Hi There ,
We have a situation where out Business Partner number range is not aligned with Customer and Vendor numbers . We definitely have BP integration in place but just because the numbers are not aligned defeats the purpose of BP in the organisation in terms of looking up a customer or Vendor .
Is there a recommended SAP practice to realign BP with customer and vendor master numbers . This will help us doing quick search which is causing more time as we need to search via ECC . We are MDG deployment on top of ECC and on 6.1 version today.
Thanks,
Binoy
Dear experts ,
Any idea on below error
Plant data , Valuation area section fields ( Serial no profile, planned delivery time, loading group etc and Overhead group , valuation class ) is not editable during approval process .
during creation its editable, I have coded at field properties badi to make it editable same is not working .
Regards,
Varun
Hi,
I have enhanced the BP data model for vendor classification and used WDC_MDG_BS_CLF_GEN component for UI.
Now need to map the standard fields in the UI with enhanced classification fields in the data model.
Thanks,
Bala
Dear Experts,
I can rename the Labels of the UIBBs but how can I maintain it for different language option?
/AB
Hi All,
I am new to MDG. We have MDG as hub scenario where other SAP system is connected.
We have to do search in the other SAP system. Can you please let me know how to configure remote system search.
Thanks,
Bharat
Hi,
I am currently consulting at a client that recently upgraded from SAP MDG 7SP2 to 7SP8. The reason for the upgrade was to eliminate performance issues, especially on mass uploads. SAP advised that the upgrade would eliminate the issue, but it did not.
When I try to do a mass upload on entity type "G/L Account (Company code)", I get a connection timed out error after abound 10 minutes into the upload. I am trying to extend 10 000 GL accounts to one company code. My client has 180 company codes and has a business rule where all GLs need to be extended to all company codes - Feel my pain.
When I do the upload via a LSWM I do not run into any issues. Also when I break up the upload file in MDG into 10 files with 1000 records each it works fine, but defeats the point of mass upload I suppose.
Any advise?
Thanks in advance
Braam
When trying to import iDoc XML files in a folder, I get the error message:
"Directory Z2_MDG_PATH is not valid".
I configure this path in tcode FILE. But,
1. in step 6, I can't see the path in AL11 or see its contents as mentioned in the below documentation
2. in step 7, I cannot use it within the UI to see the directory contents.
has anyone else faced this issue?
I followed the following steps.......
To be able to import IDoc-XML files the following set up activities need to be carried out:
Hello friends,
I have design Custom UI but i am facing an authrozation issue for going to my nxt screen after Clicking continue button.
Will you please guide me why i am getting such message while clicking on Continue button.
Here i the message which i am getting----- No Authorization for Single processing with UI Configuration (Zcustom_UI)
I am attaching a screenshot for your understanding
WHen i try creating a cost center in MDG, i face a below error.
How can i solve this. Pls help
Lakshmi.
Hi All,
Quick Question!
Can we do internal orders in finance module of MDG ? Internal orders as in the one's created in SAP using T Code KO01.
I see a couple of slides with Internal Orders under Controlling module. However couldn't find any documentation for the same. Appreciate if someone can send me some documentation on Internal order creation using MDG - F.
Thanks!
Hi SDNers,
I am trying to add a field(EXTWG) in the Material New Screen i.e Initial screen where we enter material no. and select CR type.
When I go to respective UIBB I am not getting field which I want to add .
Kindly let me know how to achieve the same.
Regards,
Neethu Joy
Hello Experts,
I have gone through the standard guide for MDG-S and MDG-C to ehance the Data Model ( Reuser Option).
Say for example if I have to add a field/attribute ZZ_License in BP_CENTRL entity.
This fields has to be added in both BP and Vendor tables.Below are my doubts :
1: So, in which case i should go for SMT mapping and when should I write the code in Handler class method ( Map to 2 API).
Difference between these 2 approaches.
2: When we extend the Data Model, as per the standard document , we need to extend the field in 2 structures
For Vendor
VMDS_EI_VMD_CENTRAL_DATA
VMDS_EI_VMD_CENTRAL_DATA_XFLAG
Why we need to extend the filed in these 2 structures since we already appended the field in LFA1 table.
What is use of these 2 structures and difference between VMDS---Data and VMDS----Xflag?
For
BP
CI_EEW_BUT000 and CI_EEW_BUT000_X
Why we need to extend the filed in these 2 structures since we already appended the field in BUT000 table.
What is use of these 2 structures and difference between CI---BUT000 and CI----X ?
Regards
Vishal
Dear all,
we are defining the solution for the financial information replication and we are finding an strange behavior when we create an edition set as "Manually after release of edition"
1. We create the edition of this type.
2. We create the change request for GL accounts , process and approve it.
3. We release the edition.
4 . We proceed to replicate the edition using the replication framework
Basically we should have 1 outbound CREMAS sent to ECC, 1 outbound GLMAST pointing to MDG and 1 inbound GLMAST pointing to MDG to move info from the staging area to the Active area . This is working in editions under "on final approval of change request"
The result if we flag both is that 6 idocs are sent..... but for the accounts we created yesterday not the ones we moved to the staging area... in terms of replication is fine as these accounts and the config for LCD5200 only sents the ones in the SKA1 but why is sending the ones not in the EDITION ( currently only one)
And why is duplicating as well the system in the NWBC transaction instead of showing the other system the MDG one?
Any of you have idea?
Dear Experts,
While blocking vendor in MDGS , i'm getting below error.
Can anyone let me know how to resolve this error?.Is there any settings in MDGIMG?
Thanks
KH
Hello,
We have developed a custom equipment data model and have configured rule based WF and implemented access class methods SAVE, QUERY.
Now, when we try to create an equipment, WF gets stuck at all steps which require CR modification (eg: Changing CR Status) with message "Change Request is locked by user XXX"
The user in the above message is the one who has last processed the CR (eg: Requester, Approver)
If we manually remove the lock using SM12 and reprocess the work item, WF moves ahead without problems. Also, even in standard data models like MM, BP we notice that a lock entry is created in SM12 but it doesn't cause problems in WF.
Can someone please guide as to what needs to be done additionally to ensure these CR lock entries do not cause problems in WF processing?
Thanks,
Sagar Dixit
