Hi All,
When i use one of the Vendor group which is of the type External Number range i do not see the Vendor number enabled , but it is only read only .
Can some one guide me on how this can be fixed ??
Regards,
Vag Vignesh Shenoy
Hi All,
When i use one of the Vendor group which is of the type External Number range i do not see the Vendor number enabled , but it is only read only .
Can some one guide me on how this can be fixed ??
Regards,
Vag Vignesh Shenoy
Hello experts:
Wanted to know pros and cons for rule based workflow vs. standard workflow template provided by SAP for MDG finance requirement.
based on SAP configuration guide, we can use standard workflow template - WS75700040 or alternatively can use rule based workflow WS60800086.
I would like to know which scenarios, it is better to implement rule based vs. which scenario we should stick to standard in case of MDG Finance.
Thanks in advance.
Sahil
Hi
I am able to create data model and UI configuration also for entity type1. It is working perfectly fine,
But when I tried with combination of entity type1 and entity type 4 as per Configuring Master Data Governance for Custom Objects - SAP Library.Though I am able to create data model and also UI configuration also. But when I try to execute it it is not working.
I can see only intial scrren for entity type with F4 help, key attribute of entity type1 and type of change request with F4 help.After giving input there it gives me error for SAP 500 (Internal Error).This tells that there is something wrong for UI Configuration.
Let me explain Stepwise
After executing node from favourites
I am getting as per below
Not sure which step I am missing?
Hi, all.
I'm Derby Lim.
Set in field property BADI ( USMD_ACC_FLD_PROP_CUST_DEP_SET ) lots fields as required.
When I press check button, some(= only MATERIAL entity) fields are checked if not entered like showing following messages.
Other entities' fields are not checked if not entered.
I found that It works on entities have a self key. eg. MATERIAL, CARR.
How to fix it? to works on all entities?
Would l rather add custom required field check logic in rule badi for entities that don't have a self key?
Thanks in advance
Hi Gurus,
I am trying to configure the SAP MDG_C scenario in MDG7.0, and as per the requirement i have to use ERP Customer UI, and as per the standard document for MDG7.0 I have i activated the BC-set for
Run the corresponding activity in Customizing for Master Data Governance under Master Data Governance for Customer
ERP-Customer UI (Alternative to the Customer UI)
Import Predefined Change Request Types for ERP-Customer UI
. and I am able to see the CR's. for ERP customer specific like CUSTL1P1, CUSTL2P1, etc...
I have also assigned the processor to my Cr's.
But, when I am trying to create a Customer through NWBC and select search customer and new-->person/organization/group.as per the below screenshot:-
I am facing the below issue:-
Note:- as per the standard documents, the CR's specific to customer UI are already there, not sure if this create an issue.
Requesting you to kindly help as this is urgent.
Any help will be rewarded.
Regards
Ashu
Hi Experts,
I would like to know how we can transport the changes made to the BRF+ objects from Development to QA in MDG. I have made few changes to the application RBWF_APP_MAT01 (change request MAT01), no transport request or package is asked so I would like to know the procedure to transport these changes. Any help would be greatful.
Thanks and Regards
Goutham Kanithi
Hi,
I have a scenario where attributes needs to be created on the fly(dynamically). Is it possible
in MDG.
For Ex: I want to create an attribute "Is the material shipable by air?" in an entity
dynamically.
Can I able to achieve it through MDG dynamically or through anyother way?
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks
Bala
Hi,
I have a scenario where product hierarchy levels and its attributes needs to be created
dynamically. Is it possible in MDG.
For Ex:
I want to create a levels such as (Food), (Beverages) and add my material Orange Juice to it.
Product (L1)
- Food (L2)
- Beverages (L3)
- Orange Juice
Can I achieve this through MDG?
I saw a blog from Steffen Ulmer (https://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-33056) where he mentioned few classifications related stuff can be
achieved through CL02 & CLHP. Is it a standard one which can be achieved through MDG? Is it an out of box feature?
Please share your thoughts?
Thanks
Bala
Hi folks,
I am getting the following error when i tried to export the data using DTEXPORT Tcode.Please help me regarding this.
Regards
Naveen
I have assigned the role SAP_MDGM_MENU_03 but no menu appears on sign on. I get the message that no menu can be derived from the assigned roles. Does anybody know how the start menu is determined. It must somehow depend on the assigned roles !? We have EHP 7 and MDG 6.1.
Hello Experts,
Can we use sap MDG vendor solution as a supplier portal as well,means vendor will provide their own information by themself and provide the discounts at realtime, I can understand we can give the access to the vendors directly with some UI option keeping disable.But is that a recomanded approach ?
Should we treat supplier mdg as supplier portal also ? What is the possible issues if we do so.
Can we replace Arkrutiv portal with MDG suppler ?
Regards,
Soumya
Hi
Can anybody explains me releationship between MDG-S BP Grouping,BP Role,BP Categeory and ERP Vendoe Account Group?
It seems there is no requried field except Change Request Description.If we input value for CR Description only, we can still able to sumbit and activate CR and Bussiner Partner ID (Which is internally generated) will be stored in MDG stagging table for entity type BP_HEADER.
My question is then what is use of BP Grouping,BP role in this as it contains blank value? Also it observed that for new ERP Vendor the Account Group field is always in non editable mode,Any reason for this? Same issue with Company Code after selecting CC it displayed as non editable field before submitting CR as well.
Dear Friends,
I am trying to create a new Custom Object, I have created the new entity and the attributes. While starting to UI configuration ,when I click on Create button to start configuration, i chose target Configuration as ID and add my custom names such as ZA_APPL, ZA_IDR and so on. While selecting Start Deep Copy I get error Message : "Configuration ZA_APPL cannot be changed in this system" and a Warning : "DEEP-COPY: Not All configurations have been copied."
How to resolve this as I am not able to move ahead. Please guide.
Thanks
Arnmitz
Hi Experts,
I am having an requirement for testing the import functionality with some financial object(either Cost centre and profit centre), so as per the below mentioned document link:-
I am having my MDG on top of ECC system only, and I want to import some sample records from my local desktop to MDG. Is anyone tried such scenarios. Because I am getting the error as my source directory is not valid.
and I gave the path of my source directory as D:/Profit centers/<FileName>.
Any help will be appreciated and rewarded.
Regards
Prateek
Hi
For MDG customer for attributes STCD1 and STCD2 in metadata it is said that they are hidden in GenIL
Tax Number 1 | STCD1 | CHAR | 16 | - | - | ControlData/TaxInformation | BP_TAXNUM | TAXNUM | DFKKBPTAXNUM - hidden in genIL |
Tax Number 2 | STCD2 | CHAR | 11 | - | - | ControlData/TaxInformation | BP_TAXNUM | TAXNUM | DFKKBPTAXNUM - hidden in genIL |
How we can make visible to them also in Data Model BP?
It seems that said above attributes are not there in BP_TAXNUM entity type also.
Hi,
Presently we are implementing MDGs. Once change request is approved and vendor is created there is difference in Number range between MDGS (stored in Table: BUTOOO) and ECC (Table: LFA1). Like to understand where and how to assign the same number range equal to ECC number range.
Thanks,
Shyam
Hello,
we would like to configure the MDG-S 6.1 Vendor UI so that external number assignment in the Vendor UI is possible. This means user is selecting an external "Account Group" in "ERP Vendor Details/Administrative Data" and is manually entering a vendor number in the "Vendor" field.
However, this does not seem to be possible with MDG-S 6.1 Vendor UI.
We tried the following configurations:
1. BP Internal Number Assignment + Vendor External Number Assignment + Same Number
-> This combination is working, however "Vendor" field to enter the number remains greyed out so that it is not possible to enter a number manually
2. BP Internal Number Assignment + Vendor External Number Assignment + Not same number
-> With this combination we are getting the error "Vendor number was not filled during external number assignment" but "Vendor" field to enter the number remains greyed out so that it is not possible to enter a number manually
3. BP External Number Assignment + Vendor External Number Assignment + Same Number
-> With this combination there is an error message "BP number is not the same as vendor number" and "Vendor" field becomes editable. However, when we enter a number manually in the field and press "Check" or "Save" the UI is dumping with the dump which can be seen below.
4. BP External Number Assignment + Vendor External Number Assignment + Not same Number
-> With this combination there is an error message "external vendor number has to be entered" and "Vendor" field becomes editable. However, when we enter a number manually in the field and press "Check" or "Save" the UI is dumping with the dump which can be seen below.
The Lean Vendor UI is showing same behaviour. On top the "Administrative Data" UIBB which is holding the "Vendor" and "Account Group" fields are hidden. When you make them visible you have the same mentioned behaviour plus some more error messages from which it seems that data entered in the Lean Vendor UI is not passed to the BP in the background since "Administrative Data" enabling is "confusing" standard behaviour of the Lean Vendor UI which is deriving BP role and account group in the background, the latter based on BP grouping and assigned account group.
Here is some additional information:
Regarding all 4 mentioned configuration options we kept the following standard configuration unchanged: "Define Prefixes for internal key assignment". In this configuration as well as in the data model "ADDRNO" and "BP_HEADER" are still set to "temporary"/"Key can be changed; internal key assignment possible (BP_HEADER)" and "Internal Key assignment only (ADDRNO)"
BP ADDRNO $
BP BP_HEADER $
We are assuming this does not affect any of the 4 configuration options above nor does it has to be adjusted for any of them ?
Most importantly, as explained we need to be able to enter an external vendor ID in the Vendor UI. The vendor ID not necessarily has to be the same as the BP ID but it could be the same. Unfortunately, we do not seem to be able to achieve this with the 4 mentioned configuration options.
-> Can anyone confirm those restrictions ?
Regards,
Michael
--------------------------------------------
The following error occurred in system : The ASSERT condition was violated.
The error occurred on application server and in work process.
The termination type was: RABAX_STATE
The ABAP call stack was:
Method: DETERMINE_STAGING_PP_SOURCE_P of program CL_USMD_MODEL=================CP
Method: READ_CHAR_VALUE_P of program CL_USMD_MODEL=================CP
Method: IF_USMD_MODEL_EXT~READ_CHAR_VALUE of program CL_USMD_MODEL_EXT=============CP
Method: READ_BP_SALES_DATA of program CL_MDG_BS_ECC_HANDLER=========CP
Method: UPDATE_PARTNER_FUNCTIONS of program CL_MDG_BS_CUST_HANDLER========CP
Method: IF_MDG_BS_BP_ACCESS_HANDLER~DERIVE_DATA_ON_KEY_CHANGE of program CL_MDG_BS_CUST_HANDLER========CP
Method: IF_USMD_PP_ACCESS~DERIVE_DATA_ON_KEY_CHANGE of program CL_MDG_BS_FND_ACCESS==========CP
Method: IF_USMD_PP_ACCESS~DERIVE_DATA_ON_KEY_CHANGE of program CL_MDG_BS_BP_ACCESS_MASTER====CP
Method: DERIVE_ON_KEY_CHANGE of program CL_USMD_PP_ACCESS_ADAPTER=====CP
Method: KEY_CHANGED of program CL_USMD_MDF_KEY_HANDLER=======CP